Systematic Review of Agrifood Chain Actors' Evaluations of Genome Editing

Alice Onek Atimango's systematic review synthesizes 90 studies on genome editing evaluations in food and agriculture. The review identifies trends, determinants, and research gaps in how different actors perceive the technology. It was last updated on 2026-05-28 and is available as a 215.8 KB DOCX file under a CC-BY-4.0 license.

Use Cases

• Identify research gaps in genome editing perception studies based on the reviewed literature.
• Analyze determinants of stakeholder evaluations based on factors like information, risk perception, and trust.
• Inform science communication strategies based on findings about effective messaging and transparent regulations.

Strengths

• Systematic review of 90 relevant studies following the SPAR-4-SLR protocol.
• Identifies key determinants of evaluations, including information, risk perception, and trust.

Limitations

• The dataset is a 215.8 KB document, indicating a limited scope of primary data.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• The review notes methodological limitations in the source studies, such as reliance on cross-sectional designs.

Provenance

Source

Alice Onek Atimango via figshare.

Collection Method

Systematic literature review.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-28 13:41:34; freshness should be verified.

Geography

The review notes evaluations are skewed towards consumers in developed countries.