Comparison of Automated and Manual Pollen Counts Over a Single Season in England
by Leah Cuthbertson·Updated 7d ago
51.8 KB1files
Available on 1 platform
Sign in to view source links and access this dataset
Description
51.8 KB of data compares daily pollen concentrations from an automated Swisens Poleno Jupiter sampler and a traditional Hirst-type trap with technician counting over a single monitoring season in England. The dataset, authored by Leah Cuthbertson and shared under a CC-BY-4.0 license, includes regression models assessing the impact of weather covariates on differences between the two methods. Agreement was measured for total pollen and individual taxa like Pinus, Alnus, Fraxinus, Poaceae (grass), Betula, Quercus, and Taxus/Cupressus.
Use Cases
Validate automated pollen sensor performance based on comparison with manual microscopy counts.
Analyze the impact of weather covariates like temperature on pollen measurement differences.
Assess agreement levels for specific allergenic pollen taxa such as Poaceae (grass) and Betula.
Refine pollen recognition algorithms for regional species based on observed discrepancies.
Strengths
Includes specific statistical agreement metrics (R²=0.741, ICC=0.514) for total pollen.
Compares two distinct measurement methodologies over a defined monitoring season.
Analyzes agreement for multiple individual pollen taxa.
Limitations
Dataset size is only 51.8 KB, indicating a very limited scope.
Row count and column-level documentation are unknown, limiting suitability assessment.
Data covers only a single monitoring season, which may limit generalizability.
Provenance
Source
figshare
Collection Method
Data collected from a field comparison of an automated Swisens Poleno Jupiter sampler and a traditional Hirst-type trap.
Time Range
A single monitoring season (specific year not stated).