Feasibility of In-Person vs. Online Caregiver Training for Severe Stroke in Peru

A 2026 pilot implementation study in Peru collected quantitative and qualitative data from 38 caregivers of severe stroke survivors one month after discharge. The dataset supports analysis of a randomized trial comparing in-person and online training interventions on tube management, bathing, and mobilization. It measures implementation outcomes including feasibility, acceptability, fidelity, reach, and adoption.

Use Cases

• Comparing adoption rates between in-person and virtual training arms based on the reported completion percentages.
• Analyzing barriers to intervention participation such as caregiver burden and technological literacy referenced in the description.
• Evaluating feasibility and acceptability metrics for hospital-based training programs in LMIC contexts.
• Studying the fidelity and reach of a structured educational intervention for nasogastric/Foley tube management and patient mobilization.

Strengths

• Dataset is openly licensed under CC-BY-4.0, facilitating reuse.
• Study design is clearly described as a pilot hybrid implementation study with a randomized, two-arm trial.
• Sample size of 38 caregivers (19 per arm) is explicitly stated.

Limitations

• Column names and a precise row count are not provided, limiting understanding of the data structure.
• The dataset appears to contain only quantitative data, while the study mentions a mixed-methods design; qualitative data may be separate.
• Metadata on the specific institution or organization conducting the study is absent.

Provenance

Source

Rosa Ecos

Collection Method

Data collected from a randomized pilot hybrid implementation study at a tertiary hospital in Peru.

Time Range

Data collection occurred one month after patient discharge; specific years not provided.

Freshness

Last updated on 2026-03-21.

Geography

Peru