Mathematicians' Proof Appraisals from a 2015 Philosophical Study

Data from a 2015 study by Matthew Inglis and Andrew Aberdein published in *Philosophia Mathematica*. The dataset likely contains mathematicians' evaluations or ratings of different mathematical proofs, as described in the paper 'Beauty is not simplicity: An analysis of mathematicians' proof appraisals.'

Use Cases

• Analyze correlations between proof characteristics and perceived beauty based on the study's focus.
• Train models to predict mathematician appraisals based on proof features.
• Study the relationship between proof simplicity and aesthetic judgment as suggested by the paper title.

Strengths

• Data is directly linked to a peer-reviewed academic publication in *Philosophia Mathematica*.
• The study design and purpose are clearly described in the source paper.

Limitations

• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• Last update date is unknown; freshness unverified.

Provenance

Source

Matthew Inglis and Andrew Aberdein (2015).

Collection Method

Likely collected via survey or experimental study of mathematicians, as inferred from the paper's title and description.

Time Range

Data collection likely occurred around or before 2015.