Ecolabel Comparisons for Popular Passenger Aircraft Types
by Sokour, Sophie / Digital Library - Projects & Theses - Prof. Dr. Scholz·Updated 4mo ago
Available on 1 platform
Sign in to view source links and access this dataset
Description
This project produces Ecolabels to compare the environmental impact of popular passenger aircraft, considering different aircraft types, cabin layouts, and engine configurations. It demonstrates the application using four case examples comparing low-cost and legacy carriers, different fleets, engine configurations, and manufacturers.
Use Cases
Compare environmental ratings between low-cost and legacy carriers using calculated Ecolabel scores.
Analyze the impact of different engine configurations on the same aircraft type's Ecolabel rating.
Evaluate how cabin layout and passenger seating density correlate with Ecolabel performance.
Assess manufacturer differences in Ecolabel outcomes for aircraft of similar size.
Strengths
Analysis includes four significant case examples covering a variety of comparison scenarios.
Methodology is based on existing methods, algorithms, and rating scales for Ecolabel calculation.
The project highlights a specific finding: aircraft with higher passenger seating density receive better Ecolabel ratings.
Limitations
The dataset scope is limited to a demonstration with four case examples, not a comprehensive fleet analysis.
Data is derived from a project/thesis context and may not represent a continuously updated operational tool.
Specific quantitative data points, row counts, and column definitions for the underlying calculations are not provided.
Provenance
Source
Digital Library - Projects & Theses - Prof. Dr. Scholz
Collection Method
Based on existing methods, algorithms, rating scales, and an Excel calculation tool to which automatic creation and printing functions were added.
Time Range
null
Freshness
null
Geography
null
The primary output appears to be a methodology and demonstration within an Excel tool; the availability of raw, structured data files is unclear.