Comparing is improving in the implementation of the Disabled Facilities Act

A 2005 benchmark study of seven Dutch municipalities (Groningen, Emmen, Almelo, Enschede, Hengelo (O), Zwolle, Apeldoorn) on the implementation of the Disabled Facilities Act (Wvg) and the Social Support Act (WMO). The dataset was developed by the Dutch Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations to facilitate municipal comparison and improve policy execution. It likely contains metrics on provisions provided, expenditures, implementation costs, and policy quality.

Use Cases

• Benchmarking municipal performance based on metrics like number of provisions and expenditure mentioned in the description.
• Analyzing the relationship between implementation costs and policy quality as discussed in the benchmark.
• Comparing data collection and project organization approaches for household care under the new Social Support Act (WMO).

Strengths

• Focuses on a specific 2005 benchmark involving seven named municipalities.
• Explicitly aims to improve policy implementation by comparing data and seeking explanations for differences.
• Covers multiple facets of policy execution: provisions, expenditure, costs, and quality.

Limitations

• Row count and data scale are unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• Last update date is unknown; the data is from 2005 and its freshness is unverified.

Provenance

Source

Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties (Dutch Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations).

Collection Method

Benchmark data collection from municipalities, developed in 2001 with a 2005 iteration.

Time Range

2005

Freshness

Data is from 2005; last update is unknown.

Geography

Netherlands (municipalities of Groningen, Emmen, Almelo, Enschede, Hengelo (O), Zwolle, Apeldoorn).