Comparative Analysis of Benthic Sampling Gear Biodiversity Assessments

Two regional datasets from northern Australia's Joseph Bonaparte Gulf and Icelandic waters compare marine biodiversity measured by different sampling gear like sleds, trawls, grabs, and imaging systems. The report reviews global studies, finding surveys concentrated in UK, Norwegian, and Australian coastal regions, with only 13% including slope or deep-sea areas. It was published by the Australian Ocean Data Network and last updated in April 2026.

Use Cases

• Compare species richness and diversity indices from sleds versus grabs across depth and substrate gradients.
• Analyze consistency of community structure patterns between imagery and epifaunal sampling gear in relation to geomorphology.
• Model relationships between environmental variables like depth and abundance metrics from trawl data for predictive management.

Strengths

• Direct analysis of multi-gear data from two distinct regions: Joseph Bonaparte Gulf and Icelandic waters.
• Review encompasses global studies, though concentrated in coastal areas of the UK, Norway, and Australia.
• Report assesses biodiversity using multiple metrics: species richness, diversity indices, abundance, and community structure.

Limitations

• Global data availability for studies using two or more gear types is described as generally poor.
• Spatial coverage is biased, with limited or no studies outside a few coastal regions and minimal deep-sea representation.
• Findings show little consistency in biodiversity trends between different gear groups, complicating generalization.

Provenance

Source

Australian Ocean Data Network

Collection Method

Review of existing studies and direct analysis of datasets acquired using multiple sampling gear types.

Time Range

null

Freshness

null

Geography

Primary regions: Joseph Bonaparte Gulf (northern Australia) and Icelandic waters; review includes global coastal studies.