Loading...
Loading...
Available on 1 platform
Sign in to view source links and access this dataset
Field data collected since 2008 assesses the condition of Delaware's tidal wetlands using the Mid-Atlantic Tidal Wetland Rapid Assessment Method (MidTRAM). The dataset includes metrics for hydro attributes, habitat structure, species richness, and surrounding land use impacts. It is provided by data.delaware.gov, with the latest update in October 2022.
License information is unknown. The dataset includes multiple columns with similar prefixes (e.g., HAB2, Other2%), requiring careful parsing.
| # | Column Name |
|---|---|
| 1 | H4: Docks/duck blinds rating |
| 2 | Condition category |
| 3 | Hydro attribute score |
| 4 | HAB4: Species richness count |
| 5 | HAB4/6: % invasive co-dominant species |
| 6 | HAB2: Horizontal veg obs rating |
| 7 | HAB2: Horizontal veg obs % obs |
| 8 |
| HAB2: Horizontal veg obs avg. 4 subplot totals |
| 9 | HAB1/2:Bear cap:final-intial avg. |
| 10 | HAB1: Structural patch type # patches |
| 11 | H2: Fill rating |
| 12 | H2: Estimate % fill |
| 13 | H1: Ditching & draining rating |
| 14 | B5/6: Barriers to landward migration % perimeter obstructed |
| 15 | B3: Altered/high impact land use % unnatural |
| 16 | B3: % surrounding development |
| 17 | B2: % natural land uses in buffer rating |
| 18 | B2: % natural land uses in buffer |
| 19 | B2: Avg. buffer width |
| 20 | B1: Estimated % with 5m-buffer |
| 21 | Depth of organic layer (cm) |
| 22 | Other13 |
| 23 | Other12% |
| 24 | Other8% |
| 25 | Other4 |
| 26 | Other3 |
| 27 | Other2 |
| 28 | Other2% |
| 29 | Iva frutescens |
| 30 | Spartina patens/Distichlis spicata |
| 31 | Unveg/mud/sand |
| 32 | Distance to open water (m) |
| 33 | Distance to upland (m) |
| 34 | Water on surface (cm) |
| 35 | Classification |
| 36 | Reason for moving |
| 37 | Sub-watershed |
| 38 | Watershed |
| 39 | H1: Ditching & excavation (OMWM) rating |
| 40 | Other5 |
| 41 | Other7 |
| 42 | Purpose |
| 43 | Other3% |
| 44 | B1: % with 5m-buffer rating |
| 45 | Other12 |
| 46 | Spartina cynosuroides |
| 47 | Spartina alterniflora/Spartina cynosuroides |
| 48 | H4: Point source rating |
| 49 | HAB4: Vertical biotic structure rating |
| 50 | Marsh community |
| 51 | B4: 250m landscape condition |
| 52 | B3: Altered/high impact land use rating |
| 53 | Phragmites australis |
| 54 | B5: Marsh habitat richness # of communities |
| 55 | Other6% |
| 56 | HAB4: Species richness rating |
| 57 | Buffer attribute score |
| 58 | Other9 |
| 59 | MidTRAM Version |
| 60 | ditches |
| 61 | Salinity (ppt) |
| 62 | Other5% |
| 63 | B5: Marsh habitat richness rating |
| 64 | HAB5/7: % invasive rating |
| 65 | Other14 |
| 66 | QDR |
| 67 | pannes/pools/creeks |
| 68 | Other7% |
| 69 | Spartina alterniflora |
| 70 | Other14% |
| 71 | HAB1/2:Bear cap rating |
| 72 | Other1 |
| 73 | Distichlis spicata |
| 74 | Juncus roemerianus |
| 75 | Other9% |
| 76 | root mat |
| 77 | HAB1/2:Bear cap: hollows present? |
| 78 | H3: Diking & restriction rating |
| 79 | unhealthy marsh |
| 80 | AA moved? |
| 81 | Marsh type |
| 82 | HAB3: Plant fragments rating |
| 83 | B1: % with 10m-buffer rating |
| 84 | B3: Altered/high impact land use % high impact |
| 85 | Other10% |
| 86 | HAB1: Structural patch type rating |
| 87 | Other11% |
| 88 | B1: Estimated % with 10m-buffer |
| 89 | H1b:Point sources tidal fresh rating |
| 90 | HAB3/5: # plant layers |
| 91 | Habitat attribute score |
| 92 | Site Number |
| 93 | Schoenoplectus americanus |
| 94 | B3: Surrounding development rating |
| 95 | HAB3/5: # plant layers rating |
| 96 | Final score |
| 97 | Stability of AA |
| 98 | Other1% |
| 99 | Other8 |
| 100 | Date |
| 101 | open water |
| 102 | B5/6: Barriers to landward migration rating |
| 103 | Salicornia virginica |
| 104 | Other6 |
| 105 | Other13% |
| 106 | HAB4/6: % invasive co-dominant species rating |
| 107 | HAB1/2:Bear cap % hollows |
| 108 | Other4% |
| 109 | Other11 |
| 110 | Tide stage |
| 111 | B2: Avg. buffer width rating |
| 112 | HAB5/7: % invasive |
| 113 | Spartina patens |
| 114 | Other10 |