Three U.S. academic institutions in the Midwest, Southeast, and Mountain West contributed data from 40 semi-structured interviews conducted between October 2023 and April 2024. Krista Cooksey collected transcripts from principal investigators, research staff, IRB personnel, and community partners discussing visual templates for informed consent key information sections. The data was analyzed using the COM-B framework and thematic content analysis.
Use Cases
- Analyze attitudes towards visual consent aids based on qualitative interview transcripts.
- Identify institutional barriers to implementing visual key information pages based on discussions with IRB personnel.
- Explore perceived benefits of visual templates for improving study workflow and participant trust.
- Assess challenges related to succinctly communicating study risks using visual aids.
- Evaluate the feasibility of visual key information pages for different study types based on stakeholder feedback.
Strengths
- 40 interview transcripts provide a substantial qualitative dataset.
- Data collection spanned three distinct U.S. regions, offering geographic diversity.
- Interviews covered multiple stakeholder groups: principal investigators, research staff, IRB personnel, and community partners.
Limitations
- Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
- Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
- Data may reflect geographic bias inherent to the three selected academic institutions.
Provenance
- Source
- QDR Harvested Dataverse
- Collection Method
- Semi-structured interviews, inductively and deductively coded.
- Time Range
- October 2023 - April 2024
- Freshness
- Last updated 2026-05-04 07:11:36; freshness should be verified.
- Geography
- Three U.S. academic institutions (Midwest, Southeast, Mountain West)