45 distinct scholarly contributions to the Goldhagen-Browning debate, reviewed and annotated by Markus Kreuzer. The dataset supports a methodological analysis of historical description, with nine works cited as evidence. It was created as an Annotation for Transparent Inquiry (ATI) project.
Use Cases
- Analyzing annotation practices in qualitative research based on the described seven annotation sub-categories.
- Studying the structure of scholarly debates based on the meta-analysis of 45 contributions.
- Evaluating descriptive inferences in historical research based on the cited works from the Goldhagen controversy.
Strengths
- Focuses on a specific scholarly debate with 45 reviewed contributions.
- Provides transparency for complex research judgments through ATI annotations.
- Uses citation scores as a proxy measure for scholarly consensus.
Limitations
- Row count and column-level documentation are unknown.
- The dataset relies on secondary, copyrighted material, limiting direct data sharing.
- Selection criteria were subjective, skewed towards Browning's works.
Provenance
- Source
- Markus Kreuzer via QDR Harvested Dataverse.
- Collection Method
- Downloading PDFs and checking books from libraries for a quasi meta-analysis.
- Freshness
- Last updated 2026-05-04 07:14:29.