Data Sheet 1_Comparison of time-segmented goal-directed teaching vs. traditional teaching

A randomized controlled trial from 2026 compared Time-Segmented Goal-Directed Teaching (TSGDT) with Traditional Teaching (TT) for Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) skills among 104 specialist nurse trainees. The dataset, authored by Chang Xie and shared under a CC-BY-4.0 license, contains results from assessments taken immediately post-training and at a 4-week follow-up. It includes primary outcome scores from an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) and secondary outcomes like knowledge, confidence, and satisfaction.

Use Cases

• Compare the efficacy of segmented versus traditional teaching methods based on OSCE performance scores.
• Analyze skill retention over time based on the 4-week follow-up assessment data.
• Evaluate the relationship between teaching method and subjective outcomes like trainee confidence and satisfaction.
• Model factors influencing procedural skill acquisition in a clinical training context.

Strengths

• Data originates from a randomized controlled trial with 104 participants, providing a structured experimental design.
• Outcomes were measured at two time points: immediately post-intervention and at a 4-week follow-up.
• Includes both objective performance metrics (OSCE scores, completion time) and subjective learner assessments (confidence, satisfaction).

Limitations

• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• The dataset is very small at 150.5 KB, indicating limited scope.

Provenance

Source

Chang Xie via figshare

Collection Method

Data collected from a randomized controlled trial involving specialist nurse trainees.

Time Range

Measurements taken immediately post-training and at a 4-week follow-up.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-04-13 04:35:14; freshness should be verified.

Geography

null