Clinical Outcomes for ACS Patients Undergoing Complete Revascularization

1,834 patients with acute coronary syndrome and multivessel disease were enrolled in a retrospective study comparing complete versus incomplete revascularization. Xiaozhi Luo authored this research, which was last updated on May 18, 2026. The primary endpoint was the first occurrence of hospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular death.

Use Cases

• Analyze the association between revascularization strategy and heart failure risk based on the primary endpoint.
• Compare outcomes for patients with different LVEF ranges based on the ejection fraction spectrum mentioned.
• Investigate subgroup effects in NSTE-ACS versus STEMI patients based on the result analysis.

Strengths

• The study enrolled 1,834 patients, providing a substantial cohort size.
• Results include specific hazard ratios (e.g., HR 0.46) and confidence intervals for key findings.
• The methodology defines clear criteria for complete revascularization and the primary endpoint.

Limitations

• The observational nature of the study and potential for residual confounding are noted in the conclusion.
• Row count and column-level documentation are unknown, limiting precise data structure assessment.
• The data is contained in a DOCX file, which may require extraction to a structured format for analysis.

Provenance

Source

figshare

Collection Method

Retrospective study of patient records.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-18 05:34:01