Sepsis Care Quality Indicators from a Three-Stage Delphi Study

A list of nursing-sensitive quality indicators for sepsis care, established through a mixed-methods study. The research involved a systematic literature review, expert interviews, and a two-round Delphi survey with 16 clinical experts. The final framework includes 3 primary, 9 secondary, and 30 tertiary indicators.

Use Cases

• Evaluating sepsis care quality management based on the established indicator framework.
• Training models for clinical quality assessment using the structured indicator hierarchy.
• Benchmarking hospital performance for sepsis based on the importance, rationality, and feasibility dimensions.

Strengths

• Indicator framework was validated through a two-round Delphi process with a 100% questionnaire return rate.
• Expert authority coefficient (Cr) was high, averaging 0.95 and 0.96 across rounds.
• The coordination coefficient (Kendall W) reached significant consensus (p < 0.001) in both consultation rounds.

Limitations

• The dataset is a 305.2 KB PDF document; the underlying structured data (e.g., indicator scores) is not directly accessible.
• Row count and column-level documentation are unknown, limiting suitability assessment for computational analysis.
• The data reflects expert consensus from a specific study context; generalizability to other healthcare systems may require validation.

Provenance

Source

Chen Huang via figshare

Collection Method

Mixed-methods study comprising systematic review (2014–2024), semi-structured interviews, and a modified Delphi process.

Time Range

Literature review covered 2014 to 2024; study completion date is not specified.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-04 05:30:33

Geography

Study focused on sepsis care quality management in China, based on the description.