Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection Outcomes Meta-Analysis

Wenjie Zhou's meta-analysis, published on figshare in 2026, compares robotic and laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. The analysis includes 10 studies with a total of 1279 patients, examining functional, perioperative, and oncological outcomes. The dataset is a 122.5 KB PDF containing the full systematic review and meta-analysis results.

Use Cases

• Compare anal function preservation based on Wexner scores mentioned in the results.
• Analyze perioperative outcomes based on reported intraoperative bleeding and complication rates.
• Evaluate long-term oncological safety based on the reported lack of significant differences between surgical methods.
• Assess the integrity of rectal mesentery preservation based on the reported odds ratio.

Strengths

• Includes data from 10 studies and 1279 patients, as stated in the results.
• Reports specific statistical measures, including mean differences and odds ratios with confidence intervals for key outcomes.
• The systematic review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251012991).

Limitations

• The dataset is a single 122.5 KB PDF document; the underlying structured data (e.g., patient-level records) is not provided.
• The authors note limitations in sample size and study design, requiring validation through randomized controlled trials.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred from the published article.

Provenance

Source

Wenjie Zhou via figshare.

Collection Method

Systematic review and meta-analysis of literature from PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-21 04:37:03; freshness should be verified.