A meta-analysis of 50 studies examines correlations between leadership styles and crisis management outcomes in public administration. The analysis includes 72 effect sizes, 26 leadership styles, and represents 21815 participants, following PRISMA guidelines. The study was conducted by Chan Nyein Aung and published on figshare in 2026.
Use Cases
- Analyze the prevalence of transformational leadership in crisis management based on the meta-analysis findings
- Investigate moderating effects of administrative subfields and continent on leadership-crisis outcomes nexus
- Study correlations between leadership styles and crisis phases, sense-making, and learning-related outcomes
Strengths
- Includes 50 studies with 72 effect sizes, providing a substantial evidence base
- Represents 21815 participants across the aggregated studies
- Methodological quality was evaluated using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools
Limitations
- Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download
- Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment
- The dataset is 14.8 KB, indicating a very limited scope likely containing only summary statistics
Provenance
- Source
- Chan Nyein Aung via figshare
- Collection Method
- Systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines, searching eight databases
- Time Range
- Studies published till December 2025
- Freshness
- Last updated 2026-05-18 04:17:03