Robot-assisted vs. Laparoscopic Surgery for Pediatric Choledochal Cyst: A Meta-Analysis

A systematic review and meta-analysis by Fei Liu, published on figshare in 2026, comparing surgical outcomes for choledochal cyst in children. The analysis includes 19 retrospective studies sourced from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to December 31, 2025. It evaluates safety and efficacy metrics such as operative time, blood loss, and postoperative complications.

Use Cases

• Comparing complication rates between surgical techniques based on reported odds ratios for outcomes like bile leakage and anastomotic stricture.
• Analyzing operative efficiency based on standardized mean differences for metrics like total operative time and hospital stay.
• Evaluating the safety profile of robotic surgery for pediatric patients based on the incidence of postoperative biliary stones and overall complications.

Strengths

• Includes 19 studies for meta-analysis, providing a quantitative synthesis of available evidence.
• Reports specific statistical results, including odds ratios and standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals for over 15 clinical outcomes.
• Explicitly states the search databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) and cutoff date (December 31, 2025).

Limitations

• The evidence is derived solely from retrospective studies, which may introduce selection bias.
• The authors note a lack of long-term follow-up data and that studies were primarily conducted in Asian countries, limiting generalizability.
• The dataset is a 226.4 KB PDF document; the underlying tabular data used for the meta-analysis is not directly provided.

Provenance

Source

figshare

Collection Method

Systematic literature review and meta-analysis performed using Stata 18.

Time Range

Studies published up to December 31, 2025.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-04-28 05:24:10.

Geography

Studies were primarily from Asian countries, according to the conclusion.