PICC Training RCT Data: Time-Segmented vs. Traditional Teaching for 104 Nurse Trainees

104 specialist nurse trainees were randomized to compare Time-Segmented Goal-Directed Teaching (TSGDT) with Traditional Teaching (TT) for Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) skills. The TSGDT group achieved significantly higher OSCE scores immediately post-training and at a 4-week follow-up, with superior skill retention. This dataset, authored by Chang Xie and published on figshare in 2026, contains the results of this randomized controlled trial.

Use Cases

• Compare the efficacy of segmented versus traditional teaching methods based on OSCE performance scores.
• Analyze skill decay over time based on the 4-week follow-up measurements.
• Model the relationship between teaching method and subjective outcomes like confidence and satisfaction.
• Investigate the correlation between procedural speed and performance based on OSCE completion time data.

Strengths

• Data originates from a randomized controlled trial with 104 participants, providing a structured experimental design.
• Outcomes are measured at two time points (immediate post-intervention and 4-week follow-up), allowing for retention analysis.
• Includes both objective (OSCE scores, knowledge test) and subjective (confidence, satisfaction) outcome measures.

Limitations

• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• The dataset is a single 83.5 KB PDF file, which may require extraction to access structured data.

Provenance

Source

figshare

Collection Method

Randomized controlled trial.

Time Range

The trial period is not specified, but data was published in 2026.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-04-13 04:35:16; freshness should be verified.

Geography

Geographic coverage is not specified.