Efficacy of Acupoint Therapies for Primary Insomnia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

A 2024 systematic review and network meta-analysis of 95 randomized controlled trials involving 7,628 patients with primary insomnia. The study, authored by Ying Wang, compares the efficacy of 14 different acupoint stimulation therapies, including body acupuncture, electroacupuncture, and moxibustion, on outcomes like total effective rate and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores.

Use Cases

• Compare treatment efficacy rankings for insomnia based on total effective rate and PSQI scores.
• Analyze acupoint compatibility patterns based on the 108 major acupoints and eight identified patterns.
• Investigate the relationship between specific therapies and PSQI subcomponent improvements.
• Assess the risk of bias and certainty of evidence in clinical trials on non-pharmacological insomnia interventions.

Strengths

• Analysis is based on 95 randomized controlled trials, providing a substantial evidence base.
• Includes data on 7,628 patients and compares 14 distinct intervention types.
• Reports specific ranking results (e.g., SUCRA scores) for different outcomes.
• Identifies the most frequently used body and ear acupoints with precise percentages.

Limitations

• The dataset is a 377.9 KB PDF document; the underlying structured data (e.g., trial-level data) is not directly accessible.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred from the published article.
• The review notes that the long-term efficacy and tolerability of the therapies remain unclear.

Provenance

Source

Systematic review published on figshare by Ying Wang.

Collection Method

Literature search of eight Chinese and English databases and six trial registries from inception to September 22, 2024.

Time Range

Trials from database inception to September 2024.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-04-13 05:48:24.

Geography

Likely global, but the description mentions Chinese databases, suggesting a strong focus on Chinese research.