Encompassing a qualitative systematic review of academic literature on masculinities in biodiversity conservation science, policy, and practice. It includes coded literature from Scopus and Google Scholar searches, along with supporting documentation such as a coding framework and a PRISMA checklist.
Use Cases
- Analyze qualitative codes from the systematic review to identify dominant themes in masculinity and conservation practice.
- Apply the provided qualitative coding framework to new literature on gender identity in conservation social science.
- Use the full list of included articles to trace citation networks and research trends in conservation biology and gender studies.
- Validate systematic review methodology using the completed PRISMA checklist against other reviews in Earth and Environmental Sciences.
Strengths
- Dataset is part of a formal systematic review process, documented with a PRISMA checklist.
- Includes supporting documentation such as a qualitative coding framework and search protocols.
- Covers literature from two major academic databases, Scopus and Google Scholar.
Limitations
- Dataset scope is limited to academic literature, excluding grey literature or primary field data.
- Qualitative coding is subjective and may reflect the researchers' interpretive framework.
- The dataset is static, representing a snapshot of literature up to the point of the review's completion.
Provenance
- Source
- Stockholm University Library Dataverse
- Collection Method
- Systematic literature searches and qualitative content analysis of academic literature from Scopus and Google Scholar.
- Time Range
- null
- Freshness
- null
- Geography
- null