A Korean study developed four pilot clinical skills assessment modules for traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine procedures. The modules, covering acupuncture, Chuna manual therapy, pulse diagnosis, and constitutional diagnosis, were implemented as formative examinations for third-year Korean medicine students. The dataset likely contains feedback and evaluation data collected through semi-structured interviews and RUMBA checklist reviews.
Use Cases
- Analyzing the perceived necessity and feasibility of clinical skills assessments based on interview feedback.
- Evaluating the appropriateness of assessment modules for licensing exams based on RUMBA checklist criteria.
- Studying the implementation process of formative examinations in medical education based on participant group comparisons.
Strengths
- Modules were developed in collaboration with expert evaluators, students, and standardized patients.
- Four specific assessment modules were created: acupuncture, Chuna manual therapy, pulse diagnosis, and constitutional diagnosis.
- Data collection involved semi-structured interviews and a structured RUMBA checklist review.
Limitations
- Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
- Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
Provenance
- Source
- Jeehp Dataverse
- Collection Method
- Participatory action research framework supplemented by qualitative interviews.
- Freshness
- Last updated 2026-06-11 00:51:20; freshness should be verified.
- Geography
- Korea