Quantitative pre- and post-training evaluation data from 100 randomly selected South Korean primary care physicians and qualitative interview data from 10 participants. Collected by Kyung Hee Chun in 2022, the study evaluates a national infectious disease response training program using Kirkpatrick’s 4-level model and the CIPP framework.
Use Cases
- Comparing pre- and post-training scores to measure learning achievement (Kirkpatrick level 2)
- Analyzing qualitative interview transcripts to identify barriers to practical application (Kirkpatrick level 3)
- Evaluating organizational contribution (Kirkpatrick level 4) based on physician feedback regarding clinical impact
Strengths
- Validated assessment tools developed by psychometricians and content experts
- Mixed-methods approach combining quantitative surveys with qualitative in-depth interviews
- Evaluation across all four Kirkpatrick levels (satisfaction, learning, application, and contribution)
Limitations
- Small quantitative sample size of 100 records
- Geographic bias restricted to the South Korean healthcare system
- Potential self-reporting bias in satisfaction and practical application metrics
Provenance
- Source
- Kyung Hee Chun, Jeehp Dataverse
- Collection Method
- Mixed-methods study involving surveys and in-depth interviews
- Time Range
- 2022
- Freshness
- Reflects a specific training cycle conducted in 2022.
- Geography
- South Korea