Perspectives on Academic Debates in Speech-Language Pathology Graduate Education

Maya Albin's qualitative descriptive study explores the use of structured academic debates as a learning strategy in speech-language pathology graduate education. The dataset contains survey and focus group data from 18 participants, including students and faculty, analyzed via inductive content analysis. It was last updated on 2026-05-23 and is shared under a CC-BY-4.0 license.

Use Cases

• Analyzing perceived skill development from debates based on themes like evidence-based practice and clinical reasoning mentioned in the description.
• Identifying challenges of implementing debates based on reported disadvantages such as student stress and navigating controversial topics.
• Developing curriculum recommendations for rehabilitation educators based on participant feedback detailed in the study.
• Comparing qualitative findings on debate utility in SLP education with existing literature from other health disciplines referenced in the description.

Strengths

• Data is derived from a structured qualitative study involving 18 participant responses.
• The dataset provides specific, participant-derived themes on skill development and disadvantages of debates.
• It is shared under a permissive CC-BY-4.0 license, facilitating reuse and adaptation.

Limitations

• The dataset is small in scale at 465.6 KB, indicating limited scope.
• Row count and column-level documentation are unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• Data may reflect bias inherent to the specific qualitative study's participant pool and methodology.

Provenance

Source

Maya Albin via figshare

Collection Method

Data were collected using surveys and focus groups and analyzed using inductive content analysis.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-23 23:11:27; freshness should be verified.