History Education Expert Consensus via Delphi Survey

21 expert history teachers participated in a three-round Delphi survey to build consensus on topics in history education. The dataset includes anonymized responses from questionnaires where consensus was defined as a median score of at least 4 out of 5 or 70% agreement. All research procedures were approved by Macquarie University's Human Research Ethics Committee (Project ID: 17496).

Use Cases

• Analyze consensus-building processes based on the three-round Delphi methodology described.
• Study expert opinion evolution in history education based on iterative questionnaire responses.
• Model factors for achieving consensus based on the defined thresholds of median scores and interquartile ranges.
• Investigate de-identification techniques for survey data based on the removal of re-identifiable screening questions.

Strengths

• Data collection followed a structured three-round Delphi methodology with defined consensus thresholds.
• Participants were de-identified and assigned random 5-digit numbers to protect privacy.
• Research ethics approval was obtained from a named university committee (Project ID: 17496).

Limitations

• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• The sample size of 21 experts may limit generalizability.

Provenance

Source

David Chilton via figshare

Collection Method

Delphi survey methodology with three questionnaire rounds sent to expert history teachers.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-19 05:22:07; freshness should be verified.