Virtual Coaching Trial for Heart Failure Caregivers in the United States
by Riegel, Barbara / ICPSR Harvested Dataverse·Updated 4mo ago
Available on 1 platform
Sign in to view source links and access this dataset
Description
Aggregating data from a randomized controlled trial with 250 enrolled informal caregivers of adults with heart failure, assessing a virtual support health coaching intervention against a control group. Data were collected at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months, measuring self-care, stress, coping, and health status. The trial tested the intervention's efficacy on caregiver outcomes and explored its effect on patient outcomes.
Use Cases
Analyze changes in self-care maintenance scale and Health Self-Care Neglect (HSCN) scale scores between the intervention and control groups over the 6-month period.
Model the relationship between perceived stress scale scores (categorized as low, moderate, or high) and caregiver burden or coping strategy scores.
Examine the correlation between active, avoidance, and minimization coping scores from the ways of coping questionnaire and caregiver health status measured by the short-form 36 scale.
Assess the impact of baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of caregivers on primary outcome measures like self-care and perceived stress.
Strengths
Data from a randomized controlled trial design with 250 enrolled participants, providing a basis for causal inference.
Longitudinal data collection at three time points (baseline, 3 months, 6 months) allows for analysis of change over time.
Includes multiple validated psychological scales (e.g., self-care inventory, perceived stress scale, ways of coping questionnaire) for measuring key constructs.
Limitations
Sample size is limited to 250 enrolled caregivers from an initial pool of 667 assessed, which may limit statistical power for some subgroup analyses.
Primary reasons for ineligibility (e.g., low HSCN score, insufficient caregiving hours) and participant refusal (e.g., perceived time burden) may introduce selection bias.
The 3-month data collection point was brief and only included one primary outcome measure, limiting the depth of mid-point analysis.
Provenance
Source
Riegel, Barbara via ICPSR Harvested Dataverse.
Collection Method
Data collected as part of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with participants assessed for eligibility, enrolled, and randomized to intervention or control groups.
Time Range
2019-2024.
Freshness
Data collection period is 2019-2024, with metadata last updated in February 2026.
Geography
United States.
Specific column names and file formats are unknown from the provided input; users should verify data structure upon access. License information is not provided.