Live vs Video Assessment of Team Skills in CPR Simulations

37 paired assessments from 48 recorded in-situ cardiopulmonary resuscitation simulations in a tertiary emergency department. Chun-Ju Lien authored this prospective observational study comparing live and video-based Team Emergency Assessment Measure ratings, published on figshare in 2026. The dataset likely contains TEAM scores and agreement metrics.

Use Cases

• Compare live and video-based assessment modalities for team performance based on the study's primary comparison.
• Analyze agreement metrics like intraclass correlation coefficients for non-technical skills ratings.
• Support faculty calibration and formative feedback programs based on the discussion of video review applications.
• Evaluate program-level outcomes for resuscitation training based on the dataset's focus on in-situ simulation.

Strengths

• 37 complete paired assessments provide a basis for modality comparison.
• Data collection involved a ≥30-day washout period between live and video ratings to reduce bias.
• Analysis includes multiple statistical methods (ICC, Pearson correlations, Bland–Altman).

Limitations

• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• Data may reflect temporal and institutional bias inherent to a single tertiary emergency department study.

Provenance

Source

Chun-Ju Lien via figshare.

Collection Method

Prospective observational study with ratings from trained raters.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-25 13:32:01; freshness should be verified.