Long Term Safety and Efficacy of Single-Incision Sling versus Mid-Urethral Sling in the Tr

A four-year randomized controlled trial comparing two surgical treatments for female stress urinary incontinence. The study, conducted at a single tertiary referral urogynecology center, reports objective and subjective cure rates, complication rates, and quality-of-life improvements. It was authored by Martin Hüser of Masaryk University and funded by the Czech Republic Ministry of Health.

Use Cases

• Compare long-term objective cure rates based on negative cough stress test results.
• Analyze patient-reported subjective cure rates based on satisfaction scale data.
• Model complication risks based on reported re-operation and mesh exposure rates.
• Assess quality-of-life improvements following different surgical procedures.

Strengths

• Data originates from a randomized controlled trial, a gold-standard study design.
• Includes four-year follow-up data, providing long-term outcome measures.
• Reports specific cure rates (e.g., 86.4% vs. 83.1% objective cure) and complication rates (e.g., 2.3% mesh exposure).

Limitations

• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• Data may reflect geographic bias inherent to a single-center study in the Czech Republic.

Provenance

Source

Masaryk University

Collection Method

Randomized controlled trial conducted at a single tertiary referral urogynecology center.

Time Range

Four-year follow-up period.

Geography

Single center study; location likely the Czech Republic based on funding source.