Expert Perceptions of Medical Litigation Peer Support Training Materials

Expert perceptions assess the quality and effectiveness of two novel educational resources for supporting clinicians in malpractice litigation. The dataset contains qualitative feedback on a facilitator training guide and a program implementation template. Author Marla Doehring published this study on figshare in April 2026.

Use Cases

• Analyze expert feedback on the 'Medical Litigation Peer Support Facilitator Training Guide' to identify strengths and weaknesses in the training content.
• Evaluate perceptions of the 'Medical Litigation Peer Support Program Template and Guide for Implementation' for its replicability across different healthcare entities.
• Correlate expert ratings on quality with ratings on effectiveness for the provided educational resources.
• Identify common themes in qualitative expert comments regarding the utility of the peer support program materials.

Strengths

• Dataset is openly licensed under CC-BY-4.0, permitting reuse and adaptation.
• Focuses on a specific, high-stress scenario with limited existing support resources.

Limitations

• Dataset is very small at 24.1 KB, indicating limited quantitative or extensive qualitative data.
• Scope is narrow, centered on expert perception of two specific documents from a single institution's program.
• No column names or sample data are provided, obscuring the exact structure of the collected feedback.

Provenance

Source

Marla Doehring, affiliated with an unspecified institution.

Collection Method

Study assessed expert perception of the quality and effectiveness of developed training materials.

Freshness

Last updated in April 2026, indicating recent assessment.