Meta-Analysis of PENG+LFCN vs FICB Nerve Blocks for Hip Surgery Recovery

Jin Li's meta-analysis compares two regional analgesic techniques for hip surgery within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathways. The dataset includes pooled results from 16 studies sourced from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang Data, and CQVIP, with data pooled using a random-effects model. It was last updated on May 11, 2026, and is licensed under CC-BY-4.0.

Use Cases

• Compare analgesic efficacy based on resting and dynamic VAS scores.
• Assess motor function recovery based on postoperative muscle weakness incidence and quadriceps strength preservation.
• Evaluate recovery speed based on time to first ambulation and length of hospital stay.
• Analyze opioid requirements based on morphine consumption and PCA pump activations.

Strengths

• Includes data from 16 comparative studies, providing a substantial evidence base.
• Reports specific quantitative outcomes, such as a mean difference of -0.54 in resting VAS scores and -9.22 hours to first ambulation.
• Follows a registered systematic review protocol (PROSPERO CRD420261295309).

Limitations

• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• The dataset is small in scale at 195.2 KB, indicating limited raw data.

Provenance

Source

figshare

Collection Method

Systematic review and meta-analysis pooling data from six literature databases.

Time Range

Literature search conducted through January 2026.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-11 10:20:05; freshness should be verified.