Audible Acceptability Ratings for Tidal vs Deep Breathing Recordings

9.5 KB of data on the audible acceptability of tidal versus deep breathing audio recordings. Sue In Choi authored this dataset, which was last updated on May 13, 2026. The description indicates rater observations on artifacts from skin friction, low lung sound levels, and ambient noise.

Use Cases

• Compare the audible acceptability of tidal and deep breathing patterns based on rater annotations.
• Investigate the impact of artifacts like skin friction on audio quality assessment.
• Study the relationship between breathing depth and perceived lung sound level.
• Assess the influence of ambient noise on the evaluation of breath recordings.

Strengths

• Dataset is openly licensed under CC-BY-4.0.
• File size is precisely 9.5 KB, indicating a focused scope.

Limitations

• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.

Provenance

Source

Sue In Choi via figshare.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-13 17:40:35; freshness should be verified.