Higher Education Social Practice Evaluation Index System with AHP Weighting

Yingping Nie constructed an evaluation index system for social practice activities in higher education institutions. The system was developed using the CIPP model, insights from 27 policy texts and studies, qualitative interviews, questionnaires, and the Delphi method. It includes four primary, eleven secondary, and thirty-seven tertiary indicators, with weights assigned via the Analytic Hierarchy Process.

Use Cases

• Weighting evaluation indicators for social practice programs based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process scores.
• Designing formative and summative assessments for student activities based on the integrated evaluation framework.
• Analyzing factors affecting social practice implementation based on the system's internal and external indicator categories.
• Benchmarking social practice quality across institutions based on the multi-level indicator structure.

Strengths

• The index system is grounded in 27 policy texts, core studies, and qualitative interview findings.
• The final system includes four primary, eleven secondary, and thirty-seven tertiary indicators.
• Indicator significance was assessed via questionnaires and the Delphi method.

Limitations

• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• The dataset is 5.5 KB, indicating a very limited scope likely containing only index weights or scores.

Provenance

Source

Yingping Nie via figshare.

Collection Method

Developed via the CIPP evaluation model, analysis of policy texts and studies, qualitative interviews, questionnaires, Delphi method, and Analytic Hierarchy Process.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-04-24 17:46:28; freshness should be verified.