<p>CASP ratings.</p>

Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) ratings for 13 qualitative studies exploring the lived experience of cognitive-communication disorder (CCD) after acquired brain injury. The dataset includes appraisals of studies involving 103 people with ABI and 66 familiar communication partners, synthesized via thematic analysis. The data was compiled by Nicholas Behn and last updated in May 2026.

Use Cases

• Benchmarking study quality in qualitative health research based on CASP checklist criteria.
• Analyzing methodological rigor in studies on cognitive-communication disorder based on the systematic review process.
• Supporting evidence synthesis for clinical guideline development based on the GRADE-CERQual confidence assessments.
• Training students in critical appraisal of qualitative research based on the applied checklist scores.

Strengths

• Includes ratings for 13 distinct studies, providing a basis for comparative analysis.
• Applies a standardized critical appraisal tool (CASP qualitative checklist) across all included studies.
• Synthesizes findings from 103 people with ABI and 66 communication partners, covering a range of perspectives.

Limitations

• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• The dataset is very small (9.5 KB), indicating limited scope.

Provenance

Source

Nicholas Behn via figshare

Collection Method

Systematic literature review and critical appraisal using the CASP qualitative checklist.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-15 17:27:36; freshness should be verified.