Occupational Disease Reporting Meta-Analysis Study Characteristics

127 studies from 29 countries are included in this meta-analysis on occupational disease reporting. The dataset compiles study characteristics from a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, with data extracted using Covidence software. The analysis covers high-income and upper-middle-income countries, reporting incidence rates from 1.71 to 1,387 per 100,000 employees yearly.

Use Cases

• Analyze the distribution of included studies across the 29 countries to assess geographic research coverage.
• Compare reported incidence rates of occupational disease, which range from 1.71 to 1,387 per 100,000, across different economic country groups.
• Investigate sector-specific annual case numbers, such as the agricultural sector (33 to 6,431 cases), for industry risk profiling.
• Examine factors affecting underreporting, like employee concerns about job security, as identified in the results.

Strengths

• Includes a substantial collection of 127 studies for analysis.
• Provides specific incidence rate ranges (1.71 to 1,387 per 100,000) and sector case numbers (e.g., agriculture: 33 to 6,431).
• Systematic review methodology follows PRISMA guidelines with independent quality assessment.

Limitations

• All 127 studies originate only from high-income and upper-middle-income countries, limiting global representativeness.
• The dataset is small at 45.5 KB, indicating limited scope and likely a summary table rather than raw study data.
• Specific column structure and row count are unknown, restricting detailed analytical planning.

Provenance

Source

Figshare, author Levina Chandra Khoe.

Collection Method

Data extracted via Covidence software from a systematic review of Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, WHO IRIS, Dimensions, and Google Scholar (searched September 2024).

Time Range

null

Freshness

null

Geography

29 countries, all classified as high-income or upper-middle-income.