Systematic Review of Tennis Training Studies with Effect Sizes

A 5.5 KB Excel file contains a summary table of studies included in a systematic review on tennis training interventions. The table includes study characteristics, risk of bias assessments, and Hedges' g effect sizes with confidence intervals. The dataset was authored by Rui Liu and uploaded to figshare in April 2026.

Use Cases

• Compare effect sizes (Hedges' g) between randomised controlled trials (RCT) and non-randomised controlled trials (Non-RCT) for different training interventions.
• Analyze the relationship between study characteristics (e.g., intervention type like VR) and the reported overall risk of bias (RoB).
• Extract summary data on participant demographics or Universal Tennis Rating (UTR) outcomes across the included studies for secondary analysis.

Strengths

• Data includes standardized effect size metrics (Hedges' g) with HKSJ-adjusted 95% confidence intervals for comparability.
• Provides structured information on study design (RCT/Non-RCT) and risk of bias using established tools (RoB 2, ROBINS-I).

Limitations

• The dataset is very small at 5.5 KB, indicating it is a summary table with a limited number of rows and columns.
• Specific sample sizes, column names, and raw data for individual studies are not provided, limiting depth of analysis.

Provenance

Source

figshare, authored by Rui Liu.

Collection Method

Compiled as part of a systematic literature review.

Freshness

Last updated in April 2026.