Discriminant Validity Results for Art Entrepreneur Innovation Survey

Discriminant validity results from a mixed-method study of exploratory innovation among art entrepreneurs in China's cultural and creative industries. The data likely contains statistical outputs from a survey of 203 entrepreneurs analyzed with necessary condition analysis (NCA) and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). The dataset was authored by Zhaohua Chai and last updated on May 4, 2026.

Use Cases

• Validate measurement constructs for innovation research based on discriminant validity results.
• Replicate or extend configurational analysis of innovation antecedents based on the described NCA and fsQCA findings.
• Study the role of dynamic capabilities in resource-constrained creative sectors based on the survey data.
• Compare innovation pathways like 'internally driven capability alignment' or 'external opportunity activation' based on the described configurations.

Strengths

• Dataset is small (5.5 KB), facilitating quick download and inspection.
• Results are based on survey data from 203 art entrepreneurs across various creative sectors.
• Applies a mixed-method approach combining NCA and fsQCA, as described in the study.

Limitations

• Row count and column-level documentation are unknown, limiting suitability assessment.
• The dataset appears to contain only statistical results, not the raw survey responses.
• Geographic coverage is limited to China's cultural and creative industries.

Provenance

Source

Zhaohua Chai via figshare.

Collection Method

Likely derived from survey data analyzed with statistical methods (NCA, fsQCA).

Time Range

null

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-04 17:36:45; freshness should be verified.

Geography

China's cultural and creative industries.