Sexual Harassment Protocol Components in Seven European Universities

Comprising qualitative content analysis results on sexual harassment protocols from seven European universities. It identifies key components such as support resources, procedural steps, and restorative measures. The dataset is 5.5 KB in size, but the specific row and column counts are unknown.

Use Cases

• Analyze the frequency and distribution of specific protocol components like 'Support Resources' or 'Reparative Measures' across the seven universities.
• Compare the implementation of procedural elements such as 'Single Case Coordinator' or 'Effective Restorative Measures' based on the qualitative content analysis.
• Identify patterns and overlaps in protocol design, referencing factors like 'Overlapping Social Factors' or 'Limited Implementation' noted in the analysis.

Strengths

• The analysis is grounded in a specific context, focusing on protocols from seven European universities.
• The dataset is derived from a documented qualitative content analysis methodology applied to existing guidelines.
• It is shared under a permissive CC BY 4.0 license, allowing for reuse and adaptation.

Limitations

• The dataset is very small at 5.5 KB, indicating limited scope and likely a summary rather than raw data.
• The lack of column definitions and sample data makes it difficult to assess the structure and granularity of the information.
• The analysis is based on a specific set of guidelines, which may not be representative of all university contexts.

Provenance

Source

figshare, authored by Marina Berbegal-Bernabeu.

Collection Method

Qualitative content analysis of sexual harassment protocol guidelines.

Freshness

The dataset was last updated on March 20, 2026.

Geography

Seven European universities (specific countries not detailed).