<p>Regression analysis on physicians’ knowledge.</p>

155 physicians working in German inpatient cardiology wards participated in a cross-sectional online survey assessing gender sensitivity, knowledge of sex- and gender-specific guideline content, and perceived implementation in practice. The dataset includes results from descriptive, correlational, and regression analyses performed by author Sophia Sgraja. The data was last updated on 2026-04-29.

Use Cases

• Regression analysis on factors influencing physicians' knowledge of gender-specific cardiovascular guidelines based on survey scores.
• Correlational analysis between gender sensitivity, guideline knowledge, and perceived implementation in clinical practice as described.
• Descriptive analysis of knowledge gaps among physicians working in different hospital settings (e.g., university hospitals).
• Assessing the disconnect between awareness, knowledge, and clinical application of gender-sensitive care in cardiology.

Strengths

• Dataset is small (5.5 KB), facilitating quick download and initial exploration.
• Includes specific statistical results: gender sensitivity (M=3.95, SD=0.73), guideline knowledge (M=0.63, SD=0.08), and perceived implementation (M=2.45, SD=0.59).
• Clear study scope: a cross-sectional survey of 155 physicians in German inpatient cardiology wards.

Limitations

• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment for certain analyses.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• Data may reflect geographic bias inherent to its collection from German hospitals only.

Provenance

Source

figshare, author Sophia Sgraja.

Collection Method

Cross-sectional online survey.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-04-29 17:33:03; freshness should be verified.

Geography

Germany (inpatient cardiology wards).