<p>Subgroup analysis.</p>

A 2026 survey analysis of 110 valid questionnaires from eight grassroots Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCs) within the Chengdu–Chongqing Economic Circle. The dataset, authored by Yang Tong, ranks collaborative development needs using the Kano model and better–worse coefficient analysis.

Use Cases

• Ranking public health resource priorities based on the Kano model attributes (must-be, one-dimensional, attractive) identified in the survey.
• Analyzing satisfaction sensitivity for collaborative needs like performance compensation and talent exchange mentioned in the results.
• Modeling regional public health system development based on the identified needs for emergency mechanisms and information systems.
• Benchmarking grassroots CDC capabilities across different regions using the survey's framework of primary and secondary needs.

Strengths

• Dataset is based on 110 valid questionnaires, providing a quantified basis for analysis.
• Methodology is clearly described, using the Delphi expert consultation method and Kano model for structured need ranking.
• Results include specific satisfaction sensitivity coefficients for 13 secondary needs across four primary categories.

Limitations

• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• The dataset is very small at 5.5 KB, indicating limited scope and likely a summary or analysis file rather than raw responses.

Provenance

Source

figshare, authored by Yang Tong.

Collection Method

Questionnaire developed via literature review, Delphi expert consultation, and Kano model, administered to eight grassroots CDCs.

Time Range

Survey conducted prior to 2026 publication.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-04-20 17:42:42; freshness should be verified.

Geography

Chengdu–Chongqing Economic Circle (CCEC), China.