Clinical Trial Protocol for PENS vs. Nerve Blocks in Chronic Low Back Pain
by Juan Antonio Valera-Calero·Updated 2mo ago
199.4 KB2files
Available on 1 platform
Sign in to view source links and access this dataset
Description
A 199.4 KB protocol document outlines a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS) to standard diagnostic nerve blocks for facet joint syndrome. The study, authored by Juan Antonio Valera-Calero and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07273006), randomizes adults with confirmed facet-mediated pain into four parallel groups. Primary outcomes focus on analgesic response, with secondary measures including pressure pain threshold, disability, quality of life, and adverse events.
Use Cases
Benchmarking non-invasive diagnostic methods based on the described PENS intervention.
Analyzing treatment efficacy for facet joint syndrome based on primary analgesic response outcomes.
Studying patient-reported outcomes like disability and quality of life mentioned as secondary measures.
Comparing safety profiles based on the incidence and severity of adverse events data.
Strengths
Protocol is registered with a ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT07273006).
Study design is explicitly described as a parallel, multicenter randomized clinical trial.
License is clearly defined as CC-BY-4.0.
Limitations
Dataset is a 199.4 KB DOCX protocol, not a data release; no patient records or results are included.
Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
Provenance
Source
figshare, authored by Juan Antonio Valera-Calero.
Collection Method
A documented clinical trial protocol.
Freshness
Last updated 2026-04-15 18:08:09; freshness should be verified.
The file is a study protocol (DOCX), not a dataset of trial results.