Pop-Management in Executive Work: 12 Executive Interviews and Argumentative Analysis

12 executives were interviewed to analyze how they justify incorporating pop-management literature into their work. The study identified four key argumentative lines used by the interviewees, including using pop-management as a decision-making tool and for personal improvement. The research was authored by Maria Paula Ferraz Calfat Duarte and is available via Open Access.

Use Cases

• Analyzing argumentative strategies for adopting business trends based on the four identified lines of reasoning.
• Studying the practical application of pop-management literature in corporate decision-making processes.
• Investigating knowledge dissemination within executive networks based on the described use of pop-management as a tool for spreading knowledge.

Strengths

• Analysis is based on interviews with 12 corporate executives.
• Findings are structured around four distinct argumentative lines identified in the study.

Limitations

• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• Last update date is unknown; freshness unverified.

Provenance

Source

Maria Paula Ferraz Calfat Duarte

Collection Method

Argumentative analysis of interviews with 12 executives.