Survey Data on Media Literacy Intervention Effects in the U.S. and India

Replication data from a study by Andrew M. Guess of Princeton University assesses a digital media literacy intervention's impact on news discernment. The data comes from preregistered survey experiments conducted around elections in the United States and India. Results indicate the intervention improved discernment between mainstream and false news headlines by 26.5% in a U.S. sample and 17.5% in an Indian sample.

Use Cases

• Analyzing the differential impact of media literacy interventions on perceived accuracy of mainstream versus false news headlines.
• Comparing intervention effectiveness across different demographic or national contexts, such as the U.S. and India.
• Studying the persistence of intervention effects over time, based on follow-up measurements mentioned in the description.
• Investigating the role of social media use rates as a moderating factor for intervention success.

Strengths

• Data is from preregistered survey experiments, which suggests a structured research design.
• Includes results from nationally representative and highly educated samples in two major countries.
• Reports specific quantitative effects, such as a 26.5% increase in discernment in the U.S. sample.

Limitations

• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• Last update date is unknown; freshness unverified.

Provenance

Source

Andrew M. Guess, Princeton University

Collection Method

Preregistered survey experiments conducted around elections.

Geography

United States and India