This dataset profiles cultural capital through historical associations for eight case study counties designated as the most renewable in each U.S. Department of Commerce economic region. It was created by Michael Petersen using public statistics and data to compare these counties to the national historic property profile. The specific row count, column count, and file formats are unknown.
Use Cases
- Analyze the distribution of historical associations (buildings, districts, structures, objects) across the eight case study counties to understand regional cultural capital.
- Compare the historic property profile of the selected renewable energy counties against national averages using compiled public statistics.
- Investigate the relationship between a county's cultural capital characteristics and its designation as a leader in renewable energy within its economic region.
Strengths
- Focuses on eight distinct case study counties, each selected as the most renewable in its respective economic region.
- Employs the established community capital framework developed by Flora and Flora to structure the analysis of cultural capital.
- Compares county-level data on historical associations to a national historic property profile for context.
Limitations
- The dataset's size, structure (columns), and specific data points are not described, limiting assessment of its analytical scope.
- Relies on public statistics and data which may have varying collection methodologies and completeness across different counties.
- The temporal coverage and update frequency of the underlying source data are unspecified.
Provenance
- Source
- Public statistics and data, compiled by author Michael Petersen.
- Collection Method
- Data compilation and analysis based on the community capital framework.
- Time Range
- null
- Freshness
- null
- Geography
- Eight case study counties in the United States, each the most renewable in one of eight Department of Commerce economic regions.