Replication materials for a 2026 study published in the European Journal of Political Research. The data supports an analysis of how deliberative citizen panels integrated into parliamentary committees affect public perceptions of procedural legitimacy. The materials reproduce the analyses, tables, and figures from the manuscript and supplementary materials.
Use Cases
- Analyzing the impact of deliberative norms like consequentiality and listening on legitimacy judgments based on the survey experiment.
- Testing the assumption that citizen deliberation enhances perceived procedural legitimacy among non-participating publics.
- Investigating how signals of high-quality listening or ignored input affect legitimacy gains, particularly among respondents with low institutional trust.
Strengths
- Replication materials for a peer-reviewed journal article published in 2026.
- Based on a nationally representative survey vignette experiment in Australia.
Limitations
- Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
- Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
Provenance
- Source
- Harvard Dataverse
- Collection Method
- Nationally representative survey vignette experiment.
- Freshness
- Last updated 2026-05-11 15:01:03.
- Geography
- Australia