Data from two Norwegian voting age trials supports a study on enfranchisement reforms. The research, authored by Jana Belschner and last updated on March 19, 2026, uses a difference-in-differences design to analyze candidate demographics and voter behavior in municipalities with a lowered voting age.
Use Cases
- Assessing the impact of voting age reforms on young candidate election rates based on the described municipal-level trials.
- Analyzing changes in voter preference vote patterns for young candidates as described in the study.
- Investigating the role of unaffected voters in electoral outcomes using the difference-in-differences methodology mentioned.
- Studying the longitudinal effects of enfranchisement reforms across multiple election cycles as referenced in the description.
Strengths
- Data is associated with a specific, peer-reviewed research question on voting age reforms.
- Analysis employs a difference-in-differences design, a method for causal inference.
- Focuses on a defined geographic and political context: Norwegian municipalities.
Limitations
- Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
- Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
- Description metadata is limited; actual data quality requires manual inspection after download.
Provenance
- Source
- Political Behavior Dataverse, authored by Jana Belschner.
- Collection Method
- Likely contains municipal-level election and candidate data from two Norwegian voting age trials, analyzed with a difference-in-differences design.
- Freshness
- Last updated 2026-03-19 09:10:15; freshness should be verified.
- Geography
- Norway, at the municipal level.