A survey experiment dataset from a study examining how citizens evaluate decision-making based on committee composition and policy type. The data likely contains responses on perceptions of fairness and amenability regarding policies impacting women, including abortion and targeted benefits. The dataset was authored by Verena Reidinger and last updated on April 14, 2026.
Use Cases
- Analyze the relationship between descriptive representation and perceived fairness based on survey experiment results.
- Model citizen amenability to decisions based on committee composition and policy domain.
- Compare public perceptions of policies framed as moral issues versus targeted benefits.
- Investigate the interaction effect of women's over-representation on fairness perceptions for different policy types.
Strengths
- Data is associated with a published paper in Political Science Research and Methods (PSRM).
- The experimental design includes three distinct policy domains for comparison.
- Last update timestamp is precisely recorded as 2026-04-14 16:21:42.
Limitations
- Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
- Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
- Description metadata is limited; actual data quality requires manual inspection after download.
Provenance
- Source
- Political Science Research and Methods (PSRM) Dataverse, authored by Verena Reidinger.
- Collection Method
- Likely gathered via a survey experiment where participants evaluated hypothetical committee decisions.
- Time Range
- null
- Freshness
- Last updated 2026-04 14 16:21:42; freshness should be verified.
- Geography
- null