58 treatment-outcome pairs from 43 studies reported in 26 papers are meta-analyzed to test claims about religious messages and political attitudes. The dataset, created by Radha Sarkar and hosted by the American Political Science Review Dataverse, was last updated on June 10, 2026. It re-examines the generalizability of three main claims in the experimental literature.
Use Cases
- Conducting meta-analyses on the efficacy of religious treatments based on the compiled experimental record.
- Testing heterogeneity claims regarding religious affiliation and religiosity levels using the aggregated study data.
- Designing future experimental research to enhance commensurability and synthesis, as suggested by the authors.
Strengths
- The analysis is based on a census of estimands from 58 treatment-outcome pairs drawn from 43 studies.
- The dataset is hosted by the American Political Science Review Dataverse, suggesting a peer-reviewed academic context.
Limitations
- Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
- Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
Provenance
- Source
- American Political Science Review Dataverse
- Collection Method
- Meta-reanalysis of existing experimental studies.
- Freshness
- Last updated 2026-06-10 18:46:20; freshness should be verified.