Replication materials examine whether public shaming via UN Human Rights Council resolutions influences bilateral foreign aid allocation by OECD DAC donors. The dataset is structured at the dyad-year level, with each observation representing a donor-recipient country pair in a given year. Author Lennart Konstantin Neumärker combined multiple international data sources for this analysis.
Use Cases
- Analyzing the relationship between UNHRC resolutions and aid flows based on dyad-year observations.
- Modeling donor country behavior in response to human rights shaming based on combined international data sources.
- Investigating temporal patterns in aid allocation following public condemnation based on the described study design.
Strengths
- Data is structured at the dyad-year level, a standard unit for international relations analysis.
- Combines multiple international data sources for a multi-faceted analysis.
- Serves as direct replication materials for a specific academic study.
Limitations
- Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
- Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
- Freshness should be verified as the last update is listed as 2026-06-23.
Provenance
- Source
- Harvard Dataverse, author Lennart Konstantin Neumärker.
- Collection Method
- Combined multiple international data sources, likely including UNHRC records and OECD DAC aid statistics.
- Freshness
- Last updated 2026-06-23 17:03:28.
- Geography
- Likely covers donor countries from the OECD Development Assistance Committee and recipient countries globally.