Rhetoric, argumentation and discourse under perspective

A retrospective study paper analyzing the evolution of rhetorical argumentation theories from the classical world to contemporary discourse analysis. The paper discusses classical rhetoric, the New Rhetoric by Chaïm Perelman, and argumentation in discourse by Ruth Amossy. It was authored by Maysa de Pádua Teixeira Paulinelli and is available under an Open Access license.

Use Cases

• Comparative analysis of rhetorical theories based on the described historical and conceptual framework.
• Methodological development for linguistic-discursive analysis of persuasive texts based on the theoretical synthesis presented.
• Training natural language processing models for argumentation mining based on the principles of New Rhetoric and discourse analysis discussed.

Strengths

• The description provides a clear theoretical framework linking classical rhetoric, New Rhetoric, and contemporary discourse analysis.
• The paper is available under an Open Access license, facilitating access.

Limitations

• The dataset's row count, column structure, and file formats are unknown, limiting suitability assessment.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• The last update date is unknown; freshness is unverified.

Provenance

Source

paperswithcode

Collection Method

Likely a scholarly paper or literature review.