Surgical Outcomes for Pilonidal Sinus Disease: Sinusectomy vs. Excision

A single-center retrospective cohort study compares two surgical techniques for pilonidal sinus disease. The study includes 351 patients, with 134 undergoing excision and primary closure and 217 undergoing sinusectomy and primary closure. Outcomes measured include length of stay, wound healing time, infection rates, and recurrence.

Use Cases

• Compare surgical efficacy based on reported complication rates like wound infection and abscess.
• Model recurrence risk based on the surgical procedure type described in the study.
• Analyze patient recovery metrics such as length of stay and wound healing time.
• Benchmark short-term outcomes for minimally invasive versus traditional surgical techniques.

Strengths

• Includes a substantial cohort of 351 patients for statistical comparison.
• Reports specific, statistically significant outcome differences, such as a recurrence rate of 18.7% for EPC versus 5.5% for SPC.
• Compares two distinct surgical procedures on multiple concrete metrics.

Limitations

• Row count and column-level documentation are absent; field semantics must be inferred.
• Data may reflect single-center bias inherent to the study design.
• Last update date is unknown; freshness unverified.

Provenance

Source

Gülhane Askerî Tıp Akademisi

Collection Method

Retrospective cohort study of patient records.