Botany Field Practice Evaluation: Survey and Rubric Data from 387 Students

A study by Gulmira Yeshimbetova applied a qualimetric framework to evaluate botany field-practice instructional materials and student outcomes. Data from 387 undergraduate students were collected via a structured survey and a rubric covering seven quality dimensions, with scores aggregated into integral quality indices. The dataset, last updated in May 2026, is a supplementary document detailing the study's methodology and findings.

Use Cases

• Evaluating the alignment between instructional design and student performance based on the qualimetric framework described
• Analyzing variability in student competency across different learning dimensions, such as inquiry-based fieldwork skills
• Benchmarking the quality of field-practice learning materials against student outcome scores

Strengths

• Includes data from a substantial sample of 387 undergraduate students
• Applies a systematic multi-criteria evaluation method covering seven quality dimensions
• Provides specific integral quality index scores for materials (KQ=0.726) and outcomes (KQ=0.706)

Limitations

• The dataset is a 19.6 KB DOCX file, indicating limited raw data scope
• Row count and column-level documentation are unknown, requiring manual inspection after download
• Conducted within a single institutional context, which may limit generalizability as noted in the description

Provenance

Source

figshare

Collection Method

Data were collected from undergraduate students using a structured survey and an evaluation rubric.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-28 06:18:29