Bronchoscopy-Guided vs. Conventional Tracheostomy Decannulation Outcomes, 2023-2025

A retrospective cohort study of 81 adult patients with prolonged tracheostomy (≥ 4 weeks) at a tertiary center between 2023 and 2025. It compares a bronchoscopy-guided non-capping decannulation pathway (n=23) to a conventional capping trial (n=58). The dataset was authored by Rundi Gao and published on figshare in May 2026.

Use Cases

• Compare decannulation failure rates between non-capping and conventional pathways based on the primary outcome.
• Analyze time to successful decannulation based on the reported adjusted hazard ratio.
• Investigate associations between patient characteristics (e.g., age, hemoglobin levels) and outcomes based on the described baseline imbalances.
• Assess short-term safety events like reinsertion rates and infectious complications based on the secondary outcomes.

Strengths

• Includes data for 81 patients from a defined cohort (adults with tracheostomy ≥ 4 weeks).
• Reports specific comparative outcomes: decannulation failure (4.3% vs. 20.7%), time to decannulation (adjusted HR 1.94), and infectious episodes.
• Employs multivariable and sensitivity analyses to address baseline imbalances and rare events.

Limitations

• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• Data is from a single-center observational study, which may limit generalizability.

Provenance

Source

figshare

Collection Method

Retrospective comparative cohort study.

Time Range

2023 to 2025

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-15 05:43:00; freshness should be verified.

Geography

Single tertiary center; location unknown.